Download the Latest ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps - 2026 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions
Latest PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification Practice Test Questions
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 89
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions whendetermining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 7, for which of the following ISO/IEC 42001 clauses was the minor nonconformity issued?
- A. Clause 7.3 Awareness
- B. Clause 7.5 Documented information
- C. Clause 7.4 Communication
Answer: B
Explanation:
The issue was thatessential AIMS processes (model training, validation, and deployment) were not properly documented- this falls under:
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5, which requires that "the organization shall ensure documented information is available, adequate, and properly controlled."
* The nonconformity was not about communication or awareness, but thelack of documentation, which is a direct violation of Clause 7.5.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.5; Lead Auditor Manual Section 5 ("Document Control Requirements").
NEW QUESTION # 90
During the audit planning phase, what is the primary activity an auditor should focus on?
- A. Preparing checklists and audit plans
- B. Conducting interviews with staff
- C. Reviewing the final report
- D. Issuing corrective actions
Answer: A
Explanation:
During theaudit planning phase, the auditor's key responsibility is toprepare audit plans, checklists, and resource allocationsto ensure an effective and efficient audit.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.1, planning includes preparing the audit plan, defining the audit schedule, and ensuring that required documents, tools, and team members are ready.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 4further emphasizes preparing tailoredaudit checklistsbased on ISO/IEC 42001 clauses and relevant organizational processes.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.1 (Planning the audit)
PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 4: "Audit Planning Activities and Tools"
NEW QUESTION # 91
Which of the following does NOT constitute an appropriate technology requirement for virtual audits between the auditee and audit team?
- A. Conducting a trial run of the audit process using the selected technology
- B. Relying solely on email communication for the entire audit process
- C. Ensuring contingency plans are available and communicated
- D. Performing pre-audit technical assessments
Answer: B
Explanation:
Relying solely on email communication for conducting an entire virtual audit is not an appropriate or sufficient technology requirement. Virtual audits must be interactive, allowing for real-time engagement, document sharing, screen sharing, live interviews, and visual observations when needed.
ISO 19011:2018 (Clause A.17) provides guidance for remote audit techniques, including the need for reliable tools, contingency plans, trial runs, and technical compatibility checks.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Annex A.17 - Use of remote audit methods
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Technology and Infrastructure Requirements for Remote Audits ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2.3 - Audit implementation considerations Here are the detailed answers to Questions 64-67, based on Scenario 8 and aligned with ISO/IEC 42001:
2023, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, and audit best practices outlined in ISO 19011:2018 and PECB guidance.
Certainly! Below are Questions No. 64 to 67 reformatted exactly per your requested structure based on ISO
/IEC 42001:2023 - Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor guidelines, with verified correct answers and comprehensive explanations with reference to the standard.
NEW QUESTION # 92
What type of evidence is an external audit report?
- A. Confirmative
- B. Analytical
- C. Technical
- D. Physical
Answer: A
Explanation:
Anexternal audit reportis a form ofconfirmative evidence, as it providesthird-party verificationor validation of conformance to specified criteria.
According to the PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3,confirmative evidenceincludesdocuments like certifications, prior audit results, regulatory reports, and third-party assessments.
Such evidence supports or corroborates the auditor's findings and helps build confidence in the audit conclusions - especially when reviewingAI systems that may require external validation for ethical or technical robustness.
Reference: PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Types of Audit Evidence," Table: Types of Evidence (confirmative vs physical vs analytical) ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.5 (Collecting information), which recognizes external records as valid sources of evidence
NEW QUESTION # 93
How does ISO 19011 recommend auditors select audit criteria?
- A. By using random selection methods
- B. Based on the organization's industry reputation
- C. By choosing criteria that are easiest to measure
- D. According to the requirements of the management system standards and objectives
Answer: D
Explanation:
Audit criteria should be selectedaccording to the requirements of the management system standard (e.g., ISO/IEC 42001:2023)and theorganization's objectives.
PerISO 19011:2018 - Clause 5.4.2, audit criteria must be defined based onstandards, statutory requirements, internal policies, procedures, and contractual obligationsrelevant to the audit.
Random selection or convenience-based criteria are not acceptable in professional audit practice.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 5.4.2 (Establishing audit objectives, scope and criteria) ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2.1 (Internal Audit planning) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Defining Audit Criteria and Reference Documents"
NEW QUESTION # 94
An AI-driven recommendation system for online shopping has been accused of promoting products from certain vendors over others without clear reasoning. The company wants to address these concerns effectively. Which core element is most relevant to resolving this issue?
- A. Accountability
- B. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
- C. Privacy and Security
- D. Human-Centered Design
Answer: B
Explanation:
The concern here revolves aroundpotential algorithmic biasandpreferential treatment, which falls under the core ethical principle ofFairness and Non-Discrimination.
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023, organizations mustidentify and mitigate discriminatory impactsof AI systems, especially where algorithmic decisions influenceuser experiences, accessto services, or market fairness(Clause 6.1.2 and Clause 8.2.3).
This core element ensures that AI decisions are:
* Equitable and unbiased
* Do not systematically favor or disadvantage individuals or groups
* Transparent in rationale and decision logic
The PECB Guide emphasizes that Fairness is particularly important inrecommendation, ranking, or classification systems, where outcomes affect stakeholders' access or exposure.
NEW QUESTION # 95
The top management of Alterhealth initially rejected the selected audit team leader because they had audited the company in the past, and thus would not bring added value for the auditee. Is this acceptable?
Scenario 5: Alterhealth is a mid-sized technology firm based in Toronto. Canada. It develops Al systems for healthcare providers, focusing on improving patient care, optimizing hospital workflows, and analyzing healthcare data for insights that can improve health outcomes.
To ensure responsible and effective use of Al in its
operations, Alterhealth has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO
/IEC 42001. After a year of having the AIMS in place, the
company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
The company contracted a certification body to conduct the audit, who assembled the audit team and appointed the audit team leader. The audit team leader had conducted a certification audit at Alterhealth in the past. The top management of Alterhealth decided to reject the appointment of this auditor because they believed that they would not receive added value from the audit. In response, the certification body appointed Jonathan, an independent auditor with no prior engagements with Alterhealth, as the new audit team leader. Jonathan's introduction marked the beginning of a collaborative process aimed at evaluating the conformity of the AIMS to ISO/IEC 42001 requirements.
The certification body determined the audit scope, which included only specific departments essential to the integration and application of Al, such as the Al Research, Machine Learning Applications, and Al Ethics and Compliance Departments, and did not cover all of the departments covered by the AIMS scope. Meanwhile, Alterhealth determined the audit time, setting the necessary time frame for planning and conducting a thorough and effective review to ensure all aspects of the AIMS within the selected departments were meticulously reviewed.
Afterward, Jonathan received a detailed offer from the certification body, outlining his role and including information related to the audit, such as the audit's duration, team members, their responsibilities, the limits to the audit engagement, and their salary compensation. With a clear mandate, Jonathan was tasked with a multitude of responsibilities: defining the audit objectives and criteria, planning the audit process, identifying and addressing audit risks, managing communication with Alterhealth, overseeing the audit team, and ensuring a smooth and conflict free execution.
With Jonathan's leadership and a well-defined audit framework in place, the certification audit proceeded with a structured and objective evaluation of Alterhealth's AIMS.
- A. No, an auditor can only be rejected by the auditee if a conflict of interest is present
- B. No, the auditee does not have the authority to reject an auditor assigned by the certification body
- C. Yes, if the auditor lacks knowledge of AI systems
- D. Yes, this is a valid reason for rejecting an auditor
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.1.7, the auditee has the right to object to specific audit team members, but such objection must be supported by a valid justification such as a perceived conflict of interest or lack of competence.
Rejecting an auditor solely based on the claim that they will not "bring added value" does not meet this criterion. Unless a legitimate concern is raised - such as impartiality, bias, or conflict of interest - the certification body is under no obligation to change the auditor.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.7 - Audit team selection and auditee objection ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.3 - Auditor competence and impartiality PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Responsibilities of Certification Bodies and Auditees
\===========
NEW QUESTION # 96
Which step involves reviewing documents and records relevant to the audit scope?
- A. Closing meeting
- B. Audit follow-up
- C. Audit reporting
- D. Document review
Answer: D
Explanation:
TheDocument Reviewstep is a key part of audit preparation where auditors evaluate relevantdocuments, records, policies, and proceduresto understand the structure and implementation of the AI Management System.
As perISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.3, document review helps auditorsfamiliarize themselves with the management system, identify potential areas of concern, and refine the audit plan.
In AI audits (such as AIMS under ISO/IEC 42001), this may include reviewingAI governance policies, data governance procedures, impact assessments, or model documentation.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.3 (Review of documented information) ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 9.2.1 (Internal audit preparation) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 4: "Document and Record Review in Audit Planning"
NEW QUESTION # 97
While preparing for an AIMS audit, a technology company faced an issue with the auditor assigned by the certification body. The auditor lacked a security clearance, which is mandatory for accessing certain sensitive information involved in the audit due to the company's government contracts and proprietary technology. The company requested to replace the auditor with someone who meets the security requirements to ensure the audit can proceed without compromising sensitive information or violating government regulations. Is this acceptable?
- A. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor has audited the company in the past
- B. No, the auditee can request the replacement of the auditor only if the auditor is in a conflict of interest situation
- C. Yes, only if the replacement is also certified for ISO/IEC 27001
- D. Yes, the auditor not holding the security clearance required by the auditee is a valid reason to request the replacement of the auditor
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.7, an auditee has the right to object to the assignment of a particular auditor when justified. A legitimate reason includes lack of required security clearance, which may prevent the auditor from accessing essential audit evidence, especially where government regulations or confidentiality clauses apply.
This is a valid and accepted reason to request a replacement.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.7 - Objection to audit team members
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Requirements for objectivity and impartiality in audits PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Auditor Selection and Replacement
\===========
NEW QUESTION # 98
Question:
A certification body is conducting surveillance audits for a company managing multiple sites, including a temporary construction site with a limited duration.
The audit team is considering whether the presence of this temporary site should influence the frequency of surveillance audits.
Can this factor necessitate an adjustment in the audit schedule?
- A. No, temporary construction sites do not influence audit frequency
- B. Yes, because it represents a management system certification of limited duration
- C. Yes, but only if the construction site operates under different seasonal conditions
Answer: B
Explanation:
Temporary sitesmustbe considered in surveillance audit planning, as they aretime-limitedandpresent specific operational risks.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.2.2states:"Audit frequency and scheduling must consider factors such as temporary sites, risk exposure, and operational changes."
* TheIAF MD1 Guidelinesfurther support the adjustment of surveillance activities based on the presence of temporary sites or operations.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.6.2.2; IAF MD1 Mandatory Document.
NEW QUESTION # 99
At which stage of the audit process is materiality assessed and determined?
- A. During audit report writing only
- B. During the initial contact with the auditee
- C. Throughout each phase of the audit process
- D. During the stage 1 audit
Answer: C
Explanation:
Materiality is not a one-time evaluation but an ongoing judgment throughout the audit process. It is assessed continually to determine the significance of audit findings in the context of the audit objectives.
According to ISO 19011:2018, auditors should consider the relevance and materiality of information when identifying audit findings. Materiality can change based on evidence found in different phases such as planning, on-site audit, and reporting.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.5 - Determining materiality
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.2 - Audit planning and execution
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Chapter: Evaluating Audit Findings and Materiality
\===========
NEW QUESTION # 100
An AI system is being developed to assist elderly people in their daily activities. The system needs to be intuitive and align with the needs and values of its users. Which core element of AI should guide the design and development of this AI system?
- A. Accountability
- B. Human-Centered Design
- C. Transparency and Explainability
- D. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct guiding principle in this scenario isHuman-Centered Design. This principle is explicitly emphasized inISO/IEC 42001:2023, particularly in the context of aligning AI systems withhuman needs, values, and well-being.
Human-Centered Design ensures that the AI system is designed with afocus on users, particularly vulnerable populations like the elderly. The AI should be intuitive, inclusive, and usable while enhancing human capabilities.
In ISO/IEC 42001:2023:
* Clause 4.2 (Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties)requires that systems consider stakeholders, particularly end users, when defining system requirements.
* Clause 6.1.2 (AI risk identification and assessment)andClause 8.2.3 (Operational planning and control)reinforce designing systems that respect and respond to human diversity and usability needs.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1lists Human-Centered Design as one of thefoundational AI principlesessential for promoting trust, accessibility, and adoption among users - especially those with specific assistance needs.
NEW QUESTION # 101
Scenario 1 (continued):
To ensure the integrity of the AI system, Future Horizon Academy has implemented measures to ensure that training data remain isolated from data that could lead to harmful or undesirable outcomes. The institution adds significant data elements as metadata, transforms the data into a format usable by the AI system, and uses data from one or more trusted sources.
Committed to standardization and continual improvement, Future Horizon Academy decided to implement an artificial intelligence management system (AIMS) based on ISO/IEC 42001 that would help the institution increase operational efficiency, resulting in improved processes.
After having the AIMS in place for a year, the institution decided to apply for a certification audit to get certified against ISO/IEC 42001. Prior to the certification audit, the institution conducted an internal audit and management review to ensure that the AIMS aligns with the institution's own requirements and that the system is being maintained effectively.
Question:
Prior to the certification audit, the institution conducted an internal audit and management review. Is this acceptable?
- A. Yes, an internal audit and management review can be conducted before the certification audit
- B. No, only an internal audit should be conducted before the initial audit
- C. No, internal audits are only required for recertification audits
- D. No, the internal audit should be conducted after the certification audit to ensure any recommendations from the audit team are addressed
Answer: A
Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit) and Clause 9.3 (Management Review) require organizations toperform internal audits and management reviewsto ensure the system's continued suitability, adequacy, and effectivenessprior to certification audits.Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clauses 9.2 and 9.3.
NEW QUESTION # 102
Did Samuel consider all the necessary factors while reviewing documented information during the stage 1 audit? Refer to Scenario 6.
Scenario 6: AfrinovAl, based in Nairobi, Kenya, develops Al tools to improve agriculture in Africa. The company uses Al to address challenges faced by African farmers, offering tools for analyzing satellite images to monitor crop health, predicting pest and disease outbreaks, and automating irrigation to use water more efficiently.
AfrinovAl has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001, reflecting its commitment to ethical and effective management practices in its Al solutions.
AfrinovAl is undergoing a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Samuel, an expert in Al technologies and management systems, is heading the audit team. Before initiating the audit process, Samuel reviewed and approved the audit plan, which served as a basis for the agreement between the certification body and the auditee.
During the stage 1 audit, the audit team focused on a detailed evaluation of AfrinovAI's documented information, critically assessing both their format and content.
Samuel held a meeting with his team to prepare for the stage 2 audit. During this meeting, responsibilities were allocated among team members, assigning specific processes, functions, sites, areas, or activities based on each auditor's expertise and the audit requirements. He also assigned auditing roles to technical experts to leverage their specialized knowledge in specific areas.
In the stage 2 audit, Samuel and his team held an opening meeting during which Samuel explained how the audit activities will be undertaken. AfrinovAI's also participated in the meeting. Afterward, the audit team conducted on-site activities to closely inspect the physical locations of the audited processes. The interviewed individuals from the auditee's personnel regarding the AIMS and observed some of the operations of the auditee. They also used sampling and technical verification to assess the implementation of Al-related controls, verify compliance with established procedures, and identify any gaps in adherence to the AIMS requirements. They skipped the review of documented information related to the AIMS since some documents had already been reviewed during the stage 1 audit. This comprehensive approach ensured a thorough evaluation of AfrinovAI's AIMS against the ISO/IEC 42001.
- A. No, Samuel should only check if documented information has been stored in the appropriate media
- B. Yes, documented information must be validated based on two criteria, i.e., content and format
- C. Yes, if the information is archived in a secure system
- D. No, Samuel should also ensure that there is a process in place for reviewing and approving documented information for suitability and adequacy
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (Clause 7.5), an organization must establish processes for creating, reviewing, updating, and approving documented information to ensure its adequacy and suitability.
While format and content are important, the auditor must also assess whether there are established procedures for control of documentation - including version control, approval mechanisms, and traceability.
Samuel's review during Stage 1 would be incomplete if it did not assess this broader requirement.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 7.5 - Documented Information
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3.4 - Review of documentation
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Documented Information Evaluation
NEW QUESTION # 103
Question:
DenSolutions, a financial institution, is seeking to certify its AIMS. The certification body appointed Sarah as the audit team leader, who previously provided consultancy services regarding the AIMS. Can Sarah audit the AIMS of DenSolutions?
- A. Yes, if a minimum of two years have passed following the end of the consultancy
- B. Yes, if the auditor does not directly audit any component of the AIMS they consulted on and only oversees the audit process
- C. No - auditors who contribute to the design, implementation, and maintenance of the AIMS cannot participate in AIMS audits
- D. Yes, with approval from the auditee
Answer: C
Explanation:
Sarahcannot auditbecause auditors who have contributed to the design, implementation, or maintenance of a management systemmust not audit that same systemto avoid conflict of interest.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5clearly states:"Personnel who have provided management system consultancy, including those acting in a managerial capacity, shall not be used to conduct audits."
* TheLead Auditor Guideexplains:"Maintaining impartiality requires that individuals with consultancy roles be excluded from auditing the systems they helped create." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Material, Conflict of Interest Management.
NEW QUESTION # 104
Which of the following competencies must at least one of the audit team members have?
- A. Experience in ethics-based AI decision modeling
- B. Knowledge of the auditee's language
- C. Teamwork and communication skills
- D. Knowledge of the risk-based approach to auditing
Answer: B
Explanation:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.5, clearly states that the audit team must collectively have the necessary competence, including at least one member with proficiency in the auditee's language (or a translator must be used). This ensures effective communication and understanding during the audit process.
While risk-based auditing is important and expected as general auditor competence (per ISO 19011), language knowledge is a specific and mandatory team requirement.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.5 - Auditor competence requirements
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.2.2 - Auditor team skills
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide - Section: Audit Team Composition
NEW QUESTION # 105
An audit team member is tasked with evaluating a sophisticated AI system used for autonomous driving. They lack the necessary expertise but proceed without consulting a specialist. Which principle is being neglected in this scenario?
- A. Integrity
- B. Confidentiality
- C. Due Professional Care
- D. Independence
Answer: C
Explanation:
The principle being neglected isDue Professional Care.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f), auditors are expected to applydiligence, competence, and judgmentduring audit activities. If an auditor proceeds with an auditwithout the required expertise, especially for a high-risk system like autonomous driving, this violates the principle of due care.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3clearly states that in complex technical environments (such as AI or autonomous systems), auditors mustseek assistance from domain specialistswhen they lack direct experience.
NEW QUESTION # 106
An audit team member is tasked with evaluating a sophisticated AI system used for autonomous driving. They lack the necessary expertise but proceed without consulting a specialist. Which principle is being neglected in this scenario?
- A. Integrity
- B. Confidentiality
- C. Due Professional Care
- D. Independence
Answer: C
Explanation:
The principle being neglected isDue Professional Care.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f), auditors are expected to applydiligence, competence, and judgmentduring audit activities. If an auditor proceeds with an auditwithout the required expertise, especially for a high-risk system like autonomous driving, this violates the principle of due care.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3clearly states that in complex technical environments (such as AI or autonomous systems), auditors mustseek assistance from domain specialistswhen they lack direct experience.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f): "Due professional care"
PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Auditor Competence and Responsibilities"
NEW QUESTION # 107
During which phase of the certification process is confirmation of registration performed?
- A. Before the initial audit
- B. During the initial audit
- C. Beyond the initial audit
Answer: C
Explanation:
Confirmation of registration (also referred to as the issuance of the certificate of conformity) occurs after the initial audit has been completed and all nonconformities have been resolved. This happens during the "Post- Audit Phase" or "Beyond the initial audit" phase.
ISO/IEC 42001 certification follows the same audit cycle structure defined in ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which includes:
* Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits (Initial Audit)
* Certification Decision and Registration (Beyond the audit)
* Surveillance audits and Recertification
Therefore, confirmation of registration is performed only after a positive certification decision - which occurs beyond the initial audit.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 9.1.2 - Certification process
* PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide, Chapter 6 - Audit closure and certification lifecycle
\===========
NEW QUESTION # 108
Question:
Which of the following examples depicts frequent analysis?
- A. The auditor observes the AI system's performance during its initial deployment to ensure it meets operational standards
- B. The auditor conducts a yearly review of the company's financial statements to assess long-term financial stability
- C. The auditor selects a sample of employees to determine if they are aware of their roles and responsibilities relevant to AI
Answer: C
Explanation:
Frequent analysisinvolves ongoing or regularly performed assessments, such as interviews with employees regarding their role awareness.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5discusses auditor sampling and analysis, andfrequent analysisrefers to repeated testing of a processover time.
* Periodic financial reviews (annual) or one-time deployment checks don't qualify as frequent - but ongoing interviews and awareness checksdo.
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.3 (Awareness).
NEW QUESTION # 109
A software development company is well-known for its innovative practices and collaborative work environment. The CEO, Alex, has fostered a work culture where team input is highly valued in shaping the company's strategic direction. Alex often organizes brainstorming sessions and workshops, inviting employees from various departments to share their insights and suggestions on new projects, company policies, and workflow improvements. While Alex ensures that every team member feels heard and valued, the final decisions on project directions, key company policies, and strategic initiatives rest with Alex. Which type of leadership does Alex most closely embody?
- A. Democratic
- B. Laissez-faire
- C. Autocratic
- D. Bureaucratic
Answer: A
Explanation:
This leadership style aligns most closely with democratic leadership. Democratic leaders engage their team in decision-making, encourage participation, and value input from all levels of the organization - while retaining final authority over decisions. In the scenario, Alex empowers employees to contribute but maintains control over strategic decisions, which is characteristic of democratic leadership.
Autocratic = Top-down decisions without consultation
Laissez-faire = Minimal direction or involvement
Bureaucratic = Rigid adherence to rules and hierarchy
Reference:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clause 5.1 - Leadership and Commitment
PECB ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section: Leadership and Culture in AIMS Certainly! Below are the answers to Questions 61 through 63, formatted according to your requested structure with comprehensive explanations and references to ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 19011:2018, and the PECB ISO
/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Study Guide.
-
NEW QUESTION # 110
......
Verified ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Q&As - 1 Year Free & Quickly Updates: https://www.exams4collection.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-latest-braindumps.html
Get 2026 Updated Free PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions and Answer: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VdBBgDRCXEtvuLDvmIi-oNGKgaGog88m
